Wolters Kluwer: Should BCBS 239 Compliance Be Viewed As A Goal Or a Catalyst For Effective Change?

As the BCBS 239 deadline is - at the time of writing - five months overdue, what approach towards compliance will prove to be more effective? Banks that have taken a methodical and timely ‘check-the-box’ approach, or banks that have viewed the regulation as an opportunity to thoroughly strengthen their underlying governance, architecture and data quality, even if that means not meeting the January 1st 2016 deadline? This commentary will explore both sides of the coin.

To first understand the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a RiskTech Forum account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: